What do you think about the AI entering DAOs and generally the world of governance?
If governance is framed as a game, it feels that DAOs/explicit governance/voting would be a bad idea because there would most likely be a dominant strategy, and the space for plurality would likely diminish.
On the other hand, with rough consensus since the game is not well-defined; the dominant strategy would be harder because the meta-game of signalling/championing/information dispersal needs to be factored in. It feels like there would be a wide range of interests that could express themselves in this system.
Best article about DAO I read for a while. From a practical xp to theory. And for once putting a practical definition of DAO as governing Open Source. Can you extend on why "DAOs have found product market fit."
What do you think about the AI entering DAOs and generally the world of governance?
If governance is framed as a game, it feels that DAOs/explicit governance/voting would be a bad idea because there would most likely be a dominant strategy, and the space for plurality would likely diminish.
On the other hand, with rough consensus since the game is not well-defined; the dominant strategy would be harder because the meta-game of signalling/championing/information dispersal needs to be factored in. It feels like there would be a wide range of interests that could express themselves in this system.
Best article about DAO I read for a while. From a practical xp to theory. And for once putting a practical definition of DAO as governing Open Source. Can you extend on why "DAOs have found product market fit."